CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33Soil Management and Crop YieldSoil erosion and sediment transportPasture and Agricultural Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Grassland management effects on soil bulk density

Murphy, Cheryl A., Foster, Bryan L., Ramspott, Matthew E., Price, Kevin P.·2004·Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science
DOI 10.1660/0022-8443(2004)107[0045:gmeosb]2.0.co;2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Various grassland management regimes have been and are being utilized in northeastern Kansas, all of which could impact soil properties. Differences in one such property, soil bulk density, could indicate differences in soil quality. Five regimes of privately managed grasslands (cool-season: hay or grazed, warm season: hay, grazed or Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)) in Douglas, Jefferson and Leavenworth counties, Kansas, were sampled for soil bulk density in 2001 and 2002. Cool-season fields have been cultivated historically (late 1800s) and recently (1950s to present) seeded into Bromus inermis, while warm-season fields are either native prairie remnants or CRP. CRP fields have had warm-season native grasses seeded into them after extensive cultivation and soil erosion. Bulk density (dry soil weight/soil volume) cores were taken to a depth of 15 cm (volume = 76 cm3) and dried to constant weight (90°C). CRP had the highest bulk density (0.90 and 0.74 Mg/m3, 2001 and 2002, respectively, p < 0.001), cool-season fields had high to intermediate bulk density (0.80 and 0.72 Mg/m3, 2001 and 2002, respectively) and warm-season native fields had the lowest bulk density (0.70 and 0.67 Mg/m3, 2001 and 2002, respectively). Hay fields were not different from grazed in 2001, but were significantly lower than grazed in 2002. From soil surveys and field observations, CRP and cool-season fields corresponded to areas of higher erosion, in addition to being areas of historical cultivation. Thus, results reflect current management (hay vs. grazing) and the effects of a previous plowing history.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1660/0022-8443(2004)107[0045:gmeosb]2.0.co;2

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Murphy, C. A., Foster, B. L., Ramspott, M. E., & Price, K. P.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
ORCID
Foster, Bryan L.
Venue
Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science
Publisher
Kansas Academy of Science
Published
2004-04
Volume
107
Issue
1 & 2
Pages
45-54
ISSN
0022-8443 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1660/0022-8443(2004)107[0045:gmeosb]2.0.co;2
OpenAlex
W2245488606
Cited by
33
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
Keywords
soil bulk density, grassland management, Conservation Reserve Program, haymaking, grazing, native prairie, Bromus inermis, soil erosion, soil quality, warm-season grasses, cool-season grasses, northeastern Kansas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review